Case Report


Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with preexisting bilateral deep brain stimulation: A case report with two-year follow-up

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  

1 Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Address correspondence to:

Nirmal Thapa

MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Program Director, Medical Otolaryngology Fellowship, Section Chief, Otology and Neurotology–Lateral Skull Base Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Otorhinolaryngology– Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 653 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209,

USA

Message to Corresponding Author


Article ID: 100023Z18NT2026

doi: 10.5348/100023Z18NT2026CR

Access full text article on other devices

Access PDF of article on other devices

How to cite this article

Thapa N, Rabadi MJ, Jabour CG, Goodlett EA, Lieberman RB, Wasoff AL. Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with preexisting bilateral deep brain stimulation: A case report with two-year follow-up. J Case Rep Images Otolaryngol 2026;5(2):11–15.

ABSTRACT


Introduction: Cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with preexisting bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems is rarely performed because of concerns regarding electromagnetic interference, device malfunction, telemetry disruption, and intraoperative safety. We report the successful cochlear implantation of a patient with bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) DBS, with two years of clinical and audiologic follow-up demonstrating sustained outcomes without DBS-related complications.

Case Report: A 79-year-old man with progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and medically refractory essential tremor treated with staged bilateral VIM DBS underwent right cochlear implantation after obtaining limited benefit from hearing aids. Preoperatively, right hearing-aid testing demonstrated consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition of 16% and an AzBio score of 33%. Right cochlear implantation was performed using a Cochlear Americas CI632 electrode array. Full electrode insertion was achieved, with normal intraoperative neural response telemetry and no surgical complications. Postoperatively, speech perception improved substantially, with CNC word recognition increasing to 74% at five months and 70% at nine months. Bimodal AzBio sentence scores were 84% at five months and 72% at nine months. During two years of follow-up, there were no episodes of DBS malfunction, telemetry interference, programming difficulty, or cochlear implant device failure.

Conclusion: Cochlear implantation can be safely performed in patients with preexisting bilateral DBS systems with careful perioperative planning and device management. This case adds to the limited literature by demonstrating successful cochlear implantation in a patient with established bilateral VIM DBS, including successful intraoperative device testing, substantial postoperative improvement in speech perception, and sustained compatibility between the cochlear implant and DBS systems over two years of follow-up.

Keywords: Cochlear implant, Deep brain stimulation, Essential tremor, Sensorineural hearing loss

SUPPORTING INFORMATION


Acknowledgments

AI was used to edit the manuscript.
AI tool used: ChatGPT (OpenAI), GPT-5.5. I certify that AI was used only for language and grammar assistance. All facts, data, and records presented in the manuscript are the authors’ own intellectual contribution, and no part of the facts, data, and records presented in the manuscript are generated using AI tools.

Author Contributions

Nirmal Thapa - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published

Marissa J Rabadi - Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published

Cayce G Jabour - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published

Elizabeth A Goodlett - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Rachel B Lieberman - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Amanda L Wasoff - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Guarantor of Submission

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Source of Support

None

Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Copyright

© 2026 Nirmal Thapa et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.